Reflection: Project 2 Conference
- rw1640
- Mar 9, 2017
- 1 min read
Like the first conference, this one was extremely helpful. I now know how I need to improve my paper and make it more interesting. I'm used to a certain format when it comes to research papers, and since this project is referred to as a research paper, I wrote it the way I was taught. Unfortunately, that means that my paper was extremely boring. It also meant that there was a lot of passive voice as well as a heavy focus on the research itself rather than the conclusions drawn from it.
We talked about how I could fix that, especially the boring part. I plan on cutting a lot of specifics of the research out and focusing more on summarizing it so that I can apply it to my chosen community. I also need to focus more on my texts rather than burying them under a mountain of admittedly boring research.
We also discussed how I can make my paper flow better. My research isn't exactly cohesive because I had to get creative, and that lack of cohesion seems to show in my paper. My instructor mapped out a way that I can use my research in a more meaningful and put together way.
I have a game plan for how I'm going to make my paper better. I know what I plan on cutting from it, as well as how I plan to go about rewriting it. Now that I have a set plan in mind, I'm not as worried about my paper.
Recent Posts
See AllI think the biggest thing I’ve learned throughout ENC2135 was to let go of the preconceived notions I’ve had from high school about types...
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k6I4Nw-uM8IE53TxvmQV4JCtYqdr55BFMoWyJ1Bc2_U/edit?usp=sharing